Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Lost thought

Whenever there is a simple idea that leads to innovation we always think "Man!!! Why didnt I think of this?" Thinking out loud of an explanation - Is it possible that the idea came to some people, some didnt deem the thought enticing to think further, some thought about it but didnt take it conclusion, some didnt say out the conclusion loud, some didnt market the idea well enough for other to know about it.

Enough of the life cycle of an idea. How many such thoughs are lost in transition. Where am I taking this topic, well I am getting at the current age where we are bombarded with Information all the time. Are we assimilating all of them? On an average, a person sees or hears abt A and before A is Assimilated, another B is introduced. Now the person takes a new direction because B Biases the almost assimilated thought A.

And I can definitely say with confidence ( i meant confidence interval of 95% ) that the conclusion C of the thought is lost because of a damaging thought D. Entangled thought E has no chance of deciphiral.

There are some Fixed thoughts F that keep coming again and again. Brain has got so used to it, they are ignored to death. Sudden gush of thoughts G come up, when the person is in stimulated environment

Entirely new thought E comes up, because the brain was temporarily Full of mixture of thoughts F. Even though the though G Gazes at the person cant react to it.

Hardly a thought H comes to Iota of a size and all other neighbouring thoughts of parellel processing I just kill it. Kaboom it was burst. A thought J Just lost!!! Or an entire Horde of distractions H just making it difficult to concentrate. "Well what was i thinking??? " Said the self obsessed thought I. Just in time thought J sorta reminds you what you were thinking but alas you need to resign to the fact you were not able to fully comprehend the same. Okay you let the thought K rest in peace.

More thoughts M might come in future. But many of them will be related to your past, what you have seen, experienced or thought. None of them purely new... You wish you had a totally new thought N , but  the thought O is not out of the ordinary because it is a result of processed thought P, even few quarantined thought Q those were locked away never to be thought again. Still the brain does go there May be because it was too radical R or it was socially not so appropriate at that situation S.

Title it any way you want, term it in any manner you want - you can be diplomatic or you can be blunt but Thought T was thought by you. It somewhere defines you. This definition leads to "What defines you?" Well, many say - what I think of me defines me as per me and what you think of me defines me and vice versa. But is it only this thought of you or me U defines me and not the action. Lets take this a level above... if you didnt think of it how can it be converted into action. So all U need not be action but all action need a underlying thought U.

If versatility was a desirable skill then a versatile thought V that can be moulded into various thought process to be Worded diplomatically W or Cite as X ( verdict without any logic or background) or deceive someone to believe at your will Y. For all you know it was just a useless thought you spend wasting time on like this post but still have a sense of achievement. All those didnt have any category will be kept under Z. :D

Peace!!!

No comments: